We now have giant ‘microscopes’- subatomic particle accelerators - costing billions of dollars, we now know that we are made of the same stuff that our television signals are made of - invisible light waves.

 

Hardly anybody understands even basic nuclear physics. It is not too difficult really. The whole of our physical universe, from the sun to our bodies, to the air we breathe, consists of just 3 basic subatomic particles, they make up everything.

The proton, neutron and electron. These are the building blocks of our physical universe. All the modern nuclear physicists have done is to discover the building blocks of Pythagoras’s unseen and normally unsensed universe, and the exciting thing is that it is teeming with life.

 

We have our physical body that is made of protons, neutrons and electrons, but we also possess an invisible etheric body that consists of much finer and faster vibrating subatomic particles that are still within the same atom as our physical particles. At the death of our physical body our mind carries on exactly as before, but within the etheric body in the very substantial universe that is beyond the range of our normal physical senses.

 

The so-called supernatural and paranormal is natural and normal after all.
“Now your world has seen the havoc wrought and the benefits that can be obtained by nuclear fission. The basis of materialism has been split altogether; the indissoluble atom has been dissolved. Scientists accept that matter is not solid, and that reality is to be found in the invisible” - Silver Birch.

When Oppenheimer discovered the atom bomb he did not do it by tinkering with a chemistry set in his back garden. He worked it out by mathematics. As soon as he wrote his equations on the blackboard his fellow nuclear physicists new that it was a bomb. This is how our modern nuclear physicists have discovered the next world, by mathematics.

We are in this world but we are not of it. We come from and will return to, the vast unseen universe that the nuclear physicists have recently discovered. The same universe that the physical researchers have known about for over 100 years.

What Is Meant By Scientific Proof?

This must consist of repeatable experiments backed up with a theory that has a mathematical base. A good example is proving that the world is round and not flat. The Greek scientist Pythagoras was the first to put forward the idea that the world was round. This was 2600 years ago. However it was 300 years later that another Greek scientist - Eratosthenes - came up with the mathematical theory for a round earth. This lacked the scientific impact it should have had because the experiment had not taken place. This came much later when Magellan sailed around the world in 1522. The experiment together with the mathematical theory completely destroyed the medieval obscurantists - the Flat Earth religious fanatics.

 

Proving survival after death is exactly the same, but not quite as easy, because here we are dealing with phenomena that are beyond the range of our five physical senses. In order to detect this type of phenomena we have to work with a medium - a machine that can do the job.

 

It was the invention of the achromatic microscope in 1830 by Joseph Jackson Lister that enabled his son to write his paper on antiseptic surgery. From this moment on we have had the proof that reality also exists in the invisible. Radio and television sets are also detecting normally invisible phenomena. They are mediums sorting out signals at different frequencies. This is the reason why we are forced to work with a human medium in order to prove survival after death. No machine invented so far is as sophisticated as the human mind and brain.

 

Like all great discoveries, scientific proof of life after death is very simple. Once we are shown it, the mystery and magic disappear. The atoms that make up the normally unsensed infinite universe are finer than the atoms in our more familiar finite universe. It’s as simple as that. Even a cursory glance at nuclear physics reveals that the subject matter is outside of our normal physical senses. If we spin a bicycle wheel at 100mph, even at this low speed the spokes become invisible. They are still there but we just cannot see them. The speeds within our physical atoms are moving up to 670 million mph. It may be even faster in etheric atoms.

Einstein’s E=MC2 (Energy = Mass times the square of the speed of light)

 

The transformation of mass into energy and energy into mass (subatomic particles vibrating at staggering speeds). This is exactly what happens when people beam down to the surface of planets in Star Trek; however fact is always much more exciting than fiction. People materialise and dematerialise in real life, in the presence of materialisation mediums; people who are now living in the vast, unseen and normally unsensed universe (the one the nuclear physicists and astronomers have recently discovered) can somehow lower their atomic vibrations and appear in our physical universe.

 

In the not too distant future we will be able to harness the energy that is stored within the atom. This will enable us to contemplate space travel at speeds faster than light, 670 million mph. There is no way we can explore our galaxy unless we break this barrier, because as far as space travel outside of our solar system is concerned, the speed of light is stationary.

A comparatively new subatomic particle, called the neutrino, has caused this revolution. It seems to be ‘out of this world’ because it has mass but still passes effortlessly through physical matter. Now we can begin to understand the reports of so called ‘ghosts’ walking through solid walls. Before the discovery of the neutrino there was no scientific explanation for this. Physicists do not regard the neutrino as the be-all and end-all, perhaps just an advance guard, but it is this particle that has made the nuclear physicists and astronomers agree with Pythagoras, Plato and Sir William Crookes, that there is indeed a vast universe that is beyond our physical senses.

 

The Etheric World Must Have An Astronomical Locality

 

As Sir Oliver Lodge and Sir William Crookes were the pioneers of radio and television they were able to put forward a rational explanation to account for the seemingly supernatural phenomena appearing in their experiments. They said this etheric world is the same place as our radio and television signals, but at a much higher frequency. Recent discoveries in quantum mechanics - the study of the building blocks within the atom - completely vindicate what these great physicists said at the beginning of the century.

They were adamant that we all survive the death of our physical bodies. The experiments proved that we must possess two bodies. One finite body containing the brain that dies, and another infinite body containing the mind that separates when our short stay on earth is over. Lodge said the people from the next world who are appearing at the experiments must possess bodies that are made of the same invisible matter as our radio and television signals; he called it an etheric substance.

 

With the benefit of hindsight we now know that a scientific disaster took place when Sir Isaac Newton’s model of the universe was discarded and replaced by Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. Einstein said on his 70th birthday:

 

“Now you think I am looking at my life’s work with calm satisfaction but there is not a single concept of which I am convinced that it will stand firm. I am not sure if I was on the right track after all.”

 

If only our contemporary physicists had shared Einstein’s scepticism, then we would not have wasted so much time and money trying to match up Neils Bohr’s quantum mechanics with relativity. Even the Einstein supporter Professor Stephen Hawking (Cambridge University) admits that they are incompatible.

 

Apart from in Russia and a few “heretics” in the west, the whole of orthodox science is locked into a largely false, and hopelessly outdated scientific theory. We are being subjected to one extraordinary theory after another, ranging from us being able to go back in time and murder our grandparents, and then to somehow be born in another universe, to the questionable Big Bang theory that says every galaxy in the universe started from the size of a pin head at a single point in time ! This is the sort of scenario we end up with if we start our calculations from a false base.

“The important thing is not to stop questioning” - Einstein.

Dr. Louis Essen D.Sc, FRS, OBE, is the inventor of the atomic clock. For trying to bring common sense into physics he was told further such activity would place the tenure of his post in jeopardy. Into this scientific vacuum has stepped a retired university lecturer with a background in engineering, Ronald Pearson from Bath.

 

Many of the world’s greatest scientists have come from the ranks of engineers. Ronald Pearson has discovered Sir Oliver Lodge’s etheric substance, and outside of Russia, hardly anybody knows about it! He has completely discarded Einstein’s outdated Theory of Relativity and just made a couple of additions to Sir Isaac Newton’s physical laws. They now match up with quantum mechanics and provide a totally satisfactory solution for quantum gravitation.

 

Pearson attended the Sir Isaac Newton Conference in 1993 which was held in St. Petersburg, Russia. His scientific paper has been very well received and published. This outstanding British scientist is recognised in Russia, but has not been reported in his own country.
This great scientific breakthrough actually started in 1933 when Pauli predicted that there may well be particles within the atom other than the proton, electron and the recently discovered neutron that would revolutionise scientific thinking.

 

We have now discovered over 200 subatomic particles making up our physical universe, coming under the general heading of quarks and leptons. In order to discover the etheric world Mr. Pearson has taken a step further, and pointed out that everything we have discovered so far within the atom is being produced from smaller primary particles at a sub quantum level. His mathematically based theory proves that when primaries of positive and negative energy collide, they breed! This yields an exciting new mechanism for creation of an expanding universe. This is very similar to what we are witnessing in nature all around us.

 

An equation we can all immediately understand: Male + Female = New Individuals

It is never a bad rule of thumb to look around at nature’s wonders when we are trying to find the answers to cosmic mysteries. When we consider that even a solid lump of granite consists of mostly empty space, and even the building blocks of the “solid” bits, protons, neutrons and electrons, cannot be seen even under the most powerful microscopes. Therefore, it is no longer so fantastic to accept the seemingly crazy idea that the life force that drives our physical body on earth, can carry on when it packs in. Prior to his death in 1988, Professor Richard P. Feynman, a Nobel Laureate for Physics, made the following statement: “If your theories and mathematics do not match the experiment, then they are wrong.”

 

Einstein’s theory of relativity cannot match the experiment where people who once lived on earth come back and prove they are still alive, because this theory is incompatible with even the very existence of an ether. Ronald Pearson’s Theory of the Ether most certainly does. It shows the ether having a complex structure, intelligence and conscious, to be the core ingredient.

“Nothing is too wonderful to be true, if it be consistent with the laws of nature.” - Michael Faraday (British pioneer of electrical discoveries)

Put quite simply, Pearson sees postmortem survival of the human psyche as one of the many functions of a multidimensional, multi-universal, subatomic grid matrix, on which all forms of life exist, and which sustains the etheric, as well as the physical consciousness, of all living organisms.

 

In this model, physical materialisations of so-called “dead” people, and even animals, are but a temporary merging of two different frequencies, or wavelengths, from two discrete levels of the grid, somewhat similar to when more than one radio broadcast is received on the same dial setting.

 

Ronald Pearson gives full mathematical proofs for his theories, and these equations may one day be hailed as the long-sought key that will unlock the door to human knowledge and to the awareness of the indestructibility of life.

 

One of the barriers to scientific acceptance of this “grid theory” (which is much more complex than this simplified explanation) has been the existence of Einstein’s theory of relativity, parts of which seem to dispute Pearson’s hypothesis. Dr. Louis Essen, however, a Fellow of the Royal Society, has informed Mr. Pearson that he has found significant errors in Einstein’s theory. This recent discovery by Dr. Essen is in accord with the statement made by Einstein on his 70th birthday.

 

Physicists and cosmologists worldwide over the past few years have also come to the same general agreement that “Einstein’s laws contain some flaws”. They are examining discrepancies that have been found in his work, and have begun to formulate hypotheses accounting for specific occurrences in quantum physics that cannot be explained by his theories. Some of these other theories were discussed at the conference in Russia.

 

Ronald Pearson is confident that his “grid theory” will replace some of Einstein’s discrepant data, and will withstand close scrutiny and criticism.

 

In his book he outlines seven experimental checks, which he is certain will give positive results and affirm his conclusions.

 

The grid itself could be visualised as the Creator-Sustainer of a number of parallel or separate universes. This reasoning does not refute the possibility of an even higher Ultimate Intelligence behind the grid.

 

Many scientific careers rely on the acceptance of the Theories of Relativity so it will be difficult for Pearson to obtain endorsement of his theory from established scientific authorities, however good Pearson’s theory is.

 

This is the form of hazard all reformers meet.

 

Dying is as natural as being born; we all pass into the next world whether we like it or not. Life continues and endures in the next dimension with no divine intervention or retribution, regardless of one’s religious beliefs or lack thereof.

 

After this review, the entity moves to the plane which best suits the condition of his or her state of being. There are infinite numbers and graduations of these etheric planes, and with the help of guides, teachers, centres for learning, advancement to higher levels of existence is within the reach of every inhabitant on every plane.

 

Nothing else matters during our short stay on this backward training ground, planet Earth, but only on how we behave. We are here to develop our characters, no other reason.

 

Nothing else matters in the slightest; nationality, what we believe, wealth, social position, what we look like, how we speak, what we do for a living. We are all exactly the same, graded only by the progress we have made.

 

Opposition from certain establishment scientists to this view of after death survival being a natural function of subatomic processes has also been quite strong.

 

In spite of Lord Kelvin’s assertion that “Science is bound by the everlasting law of honour to face fearlessly every problem which can fairly be presented to it”, some scientists have refused to even look at Pearson’s data, or review the hypotheses of other researchers.

 

Few subjects more infuriate scientists than claims of paranormal phenomena, because, if confirmed, the whole fabric of science would be threatened.

 

Nothing should threaten true science, which in essence is nothing more than the unceasing search for knowledge. Observed and verifiable facts call for an explanation of their cause, no matter how uncomfortable the eventual solution may be for its discoverers. This reluctance to explore new areas of science can be equated with the torturing and burning alive in 1600 of Giordano Bruno, the scientist-philosopher who refused to recant his statement that “there exist countless suns, with countless worlds revolving around them”.

 

The priests and so-called “scientists” of Galileo’s day refused to view the heavens through his telescope, fearing what they may observe in the night sky would overturn their antiquated cherished beliefs!